300065 Anthropology of (Extra)Ordinary Politics (S) (WiSe 2014/2015)

In his book “Anthropology, Politics, and the State” (2007) Jonathan Spencer has raised the question, “what happened to the anthropology of politics?” Although he dates the “strange death” of political anthropology back in the 1970s and notes that during the last two decades the sub-discipline seems to be on the road of recovery, nevertheless his question is still pertinent. Whereas the problem with classical political anthropology was that it defined politics rather too narrowly – i.e. separating politics from culture, and negating the importance of values in political practice – today the trivialization of power has lead to a broader definition of politics, identifying it as everything and everywhere. This raises new dilemmas, because “if everything is ‚political’ what word can we use to mark out that special area of life which people themselves refer to as ‘politics’?” (Spencer, 1997: 13). Spencer’s proposition is simple, we must pay close attention as to what politics is for the people in particular contexts and particular time, and trace its highly volatile manifestations in the sites of the ordinary: „from mass rallies to village arguments, in some cases into houses and families and through the particularity of everyday practices“ (Spencer, 1997: 9). This proposition is not something revolutionary or new, because anthropology was always preoccupied with the mundane and with the everyday claiming that “lives outside of the ordinary, become emptied of experience, lose touch with life” (Das, 2007: 6). However it further begs for a set of questions about: what actually is the ordinary? What constitutes everyday life and everyday politics? More importantly what is the difference between the ordinary and extraordinary? When does the ordinary turn out to be extraordinary and vice versa? Or formulated in a different way how and when does violence interrupt the ordinary, “but is still part of the everyday” (Das, 2007: 7)?
This seminar attempts to find answers to the above posed questions and aims to problematize politics, the ordinary as well as violence, and their dialectical relationship. We will focus on concrete case studies, which highlight creative moments in the everyday life of the people, whose life is marked by violence. Hence the seminar’s aim will be to go beyond the assumption of cultural or societal determinism.

Bibliography

Biehl, João Guilherme (2005): Vita. Life in a zone of social abandonment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Certeau, Michel de (1984): The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Chatterji, Roma; Mehta, Deepak (2007): Living with violence. An anthropology of events and everyday life. 1st ed. London u.a: Routledge (Critical Asian studies).
Chitralekha (2012): Ordinary people, extraordinary violence. Naxalites and Hindu extremists in India. New-Delhi: Routledge.
Das, Veena (1998): Wittgenstein and anthropology. In Annual review of anthropology.
Das, Veena (2007): Life and words. Violence and the descent into the ordinary. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Nordstrom, Carolyn; Robben, Antonius C. G. M. (1995): Fieldwork under fire. Contemporary studies of violence and survival. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Scheper-Hughes, Nancy (1993): Death without weeping. The violence of everyday life in Brazil. 1st ed. Berkeley Calif. u.a: Univ. of Calif. Press (A centennial book).
Spencer, Jonathan (2007): Anthropology, politics and the state. Democracy and violence in South Asia. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press (New departures in anthropology).
Stewart, Kathleen (2007): Ordinary affects. Durham N.C. ; London: Duke University Press.
Wikan, Unni (2012): Resonance. Beyond the words. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.