Art is not an illustration of politics. Nor is art simply about beauty, while politics is about power. Instead, both are interwoven through sometimes constitutive, sometimes disruptive imaginations of collectivity. Starting from these assumptions, the seminar explores the formative ways in which artistic practices and representations are intertwined with the contingencies, conflicts and (dis)ordering of societal collectives. In the Leviathan, Hobbes (1651) had already made clear that art could become the ally of political power by making visible the sovereignty and legitimacy of those who govern. Monuments and parliament buildings are supposed to confirm societal order by making evident its eternal validity. Benjamin (1935) even argued that the “logical result of fascism is the introduction of aesthetics into political life. […] Communism responds by politicizing art.” But art may also deeply irritate our worldviews and shatter our understanding of what should be taken for granted. Artists like Abramović, Beuys, Bacon or Horn have tested conventions of both the individual and collective body to the extreme. Inspired by science and technology, Haacke or Wurm continue to deeply provocate political constellations and even the political function of art itself. These provocations include the role of museums and galleries as spaces empowering but also limiting artistic expression and the “politics of aesthetics” (Rancière).
Taking art and artworks in their own right (and not as illustrations), the seminar sets out to discuss the relationship between art and politics from the perspectives of political theory, political sociology, comparative politics and science & technology studies. With its focus on questions of political aesthetics, epistemology and knowledge, it is also open to students of the ISOS master program. We will discuss relevant texts by Adorno, Arendt, Benjamin, Bourdieu, Danto, Du Bois, Groys, Habermas, Putnam, Rancière and others. In June 2025, we will visit Berlin to discuss selected works of art and architecture, with a specific focus on the exhibition “Extreme Tension. Art between Politics and Society” at the Neue Nationalgalerie.
Homepage „Extreme Tension”, NNG: www.smb.museum/en/museums-institutions/neue-nationalgalerie/exhibitions/detail/extreme-tension-art-between-politics-and-society/
Möller, F. Politics and Art. In Oxford Handbook Topics in Politics (online). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935307.013.13
Frequency | Weekday | Time | Format / Place | Period |
---|
Module | Course | Requirements | |
---|---|---|---|
30-HEPS-HM2_a Hauptmodul 2: Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft | Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft I | Study requirement
|
Student information |
Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft II | Graded examination
|
Student information | |
30-M-PW-M2 Öffentlichkeit, Medien und Politische Kommunikation | Öffentlichkeit, Medien und politische Kommunikation a | Study requirement
|
Student information |
Öffentlichkeit, Medien und politische Kommunikation b | Study requirement
|
Student information | |
- | Graded examination | Student information | |
30-M-Soz-M5_LF1 Lehrforschung in Politischer Soziologie | Alternativ zu Seminar 1 und Seminar 2: großes Seminar | Study requirement
|
Student information |
- | Graded examination | Student information | |
30-MeWi-HM2 Medien und Gesellschaft | Lehrveranstaltung I | Graded examination
|
Student information |
Lehrveranstaltung II | Study requirement
|
Student information | |
Lehrveranstaltung III | Study requirement
|
Student information |
The binding module descriptions contain further information, including specifications on the "types of assignments" students need to complete. In cases where a module description mentions more than one kind of assignment, the respective member of the teaching staff will decide which task(s) they assign the students.