Over the last decade the ideas, concepts and tools of risk management have come to colonise the way that organisations across the private and public sectors increasingly manage an ever-expanding range of potential adverse outcomes associated with their activities. No longer confined to managing harms to human health and safety or financial loss, there now seems to be no limit to the range of adverse outcomes that are now explicitly conceived as risks to be managed, be they operational risks, security risks, legal risks, reputational risks and ethical risks to name just a few.
The management of potential adverse outcomes is nothing new for organisations. What is new, however, is the way in which risk management has emerged as a distinctive discipline with a particular set of normative assumptions for framing, analysing and responding to information about potential adverse events. Risk management is premised on the simple idea that it is sub-optimal to seek to eliminate all potential adverse outcomes. It sets out to define optimal levels of adverse outcomes, based on an assessment of their probability and impact, and then focuses management efforts on those risks that are judged unacceptable.
Risk management methods are widely promulgated as efficient, rational and universally applicable means for challenging organisational practices in ways that manage their inevitable downsides without stifling entrepreneurialism. However, relatively little attention (with a number of notable exceptions) has been paid to the extent to which risk ideas are able to challenge organisational practice. Yet there are good reasons to expect that risk management as a means of organisational challenge may have only limited impact. Therefore, in this seminar we discuss that gap by examining the literature on risk management and their impacts on organisations.
Perrow C. (1984) Normal Accidents. Living with High-Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books
Luhmann, Niklas (2008) Risk A sociological Theory. New Brunswick. Aldine Transcation (chapter 10)
Rhythmus | Tag | Uhrzeit | Format / Ort | Zeitraum | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
wöchentlich | Mo | 14-16 | U4-211 | 08.10.2012-01.02.2013
nicht am: 24.12.12 / 31.12.12 |
Bitte Raumänderung beachten!!! |
Verstecke vergangene Termine <<
Modul | Veranstaltung | Leistungen | |
---|---|---|---|
30-M-Soz-M10a Wissenschafts- und Techniksoziologie a | Seminar 1 | Studienleistung
|
Studieninformation |
Seminar 2 | Studienleistung
|
Studieninformation | |
- | benotete Prüfungsleistung | Studieninformation | |
30-M-Soz-M10b Wissenschafts- und Techniksoziologie b | Seminar 1 | Studienleistung
|
Studieninformation |
Seminar 2 | Studienleistung
|
Studieninformation | |
- | benotete Prüfungsleistung | Studieninformation |
Die verbindlichen Modulbeschreibungen enthalten weitere Informationen, auch zu den "Leistungen" und ihren Anforderungen. Sind mehrere "Leistungsformen" möglich, entscheiden die jeweiligen Lehrenden darüber.
Studiengang/-angebot | Gültigkeit | Variante | Untergliederung | Status | Sem. | LP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
History, Philosophy and Sociology of Science / Master | (Einschreibung bis SoSe 2014) | Hauptmodul 4 | Wahlpflicht | 2 | zusätzlich 4 LP für eine benotete Einzelleistung, 2 LP für eine unbenotete Einzelleistung HS | ||
Pädagogik / Erziehungswissenschaft / Diplom | (Einschreibung bis SoSe 2008) | H.S.2; H.S.3 | scheinfähig | ||||
Politische Kommunikation / Master | (Einschreibung bis SoSe 2013) | 3.2 | Wahl | 3 | (bei Einzelleistung 2 LP zusätzlich) | ||
Soziologie / Diplom | (Einschreibung bis SoSe 2005) | 2.2.4 (DPO02) | Wahl | HS | |||
Soziologie / Master | (Einschreibung bis SoSe 2012) | Modul 3.3 | Wahl | 3 | (bei Einzelleistung 3 LP zusätzlich) |