University is one of the few institutions in existence nowadays whose both origins and some of the defining features are distinctly medieval. University is certainly the only medieval institution which has ever since the early modern period been at the forefront of progress and discovery. Throughout its centuries-long history, it has shown great ability to remain relevant, while also being remarkably resilient to all sorts of external pressures. A scholar once noted that “changing a university is like moving a graveyard, you get no help from the people inside.” And indeed, universities are not particularly cooperative with those who try to force change on them - on the contrary.
However, many argue that today universities are not only facing unprecedented challenges, but that they are changing in a way that threatens the very essence of the institution that they represent. But is it really so? If yes, what do we make out of it? How does this affect students, professors, employers, countries, the entire world? How do we explain what we observe? And, if we are to go a step further, what do we do about that?
In this course, we will jointly address these and other related questions and look at how we can theoretically account for them. Specifically, the course should help students to:
- Critically reflect on the nature of university, as an institution and as an organisation, from a sociological perspective;
- Deepen their understanding of challenges universities nowadays face;
- Theoretically engage with global trends and processes, as well as context-specific dynamics in which contemporary universities operate.
Each session will be organised around one or two themes. The seminar will be interactive and students will be encouraged to share their ideas, thoughts, experiences and personal views on the issues discussed.
To be read before the course starts (December 9):
Clark, B. R. (1983). "The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective". Berkeley: University of California Press. Chapter 1 “Knowledge” (pp. 11-26).
Kerr, C. (2001). "The Uses of the University". Harvard University Press. Chapter 1 "The Idea of Multiversity" (pp. 1-33).
Gumport, P. J. (2000). Academic restructuring: Organizational change and institutional imperatives. "Higher Education", 39(1), 67–91.
Lohmann, S. (2004). Can’t the university be more like business? "Economics of Governance", 5(1), 9–27.
Boulton, G. (2009, March 29). GLOBAL: What are universities for? "University World News", (69). Retrieved from http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20090326200944986
The world is going to university. (2015, March 28). "The Economist". Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21647285-more-and-more-money-being-spent-higher-education-too-little-known-about-whether-it
Marginson, S. (2010, May 30). The Rise of the Global University: 5 New Tensions. "The Chronicle of Higher Education". Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/The-Rise-of-the-Global/65694/
Deresiewicz, W. (2014, July 22). Don’t Send Your Kid to the Ivy League. "New Republic". Retrieved from https://newrepublic.com/article/118747/ivy-league-schools-are-overrated-send-your-kids-elsewhere
Additional reading (for the brave ones):
Clark, B. R. (1983). "The Higher Education System: Academic Organization in Cross-National Perspective". Berkeley: University of California Press. Chapters 7 & 8 “Values” and “Preferences” (pp. 240-276).
Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., Frank, D. J., & Schofer, E. (2008). Higher Education as an Institution. In P. J. Gumport (Ed.), "Sociology of Higher Education: Contributions and Their Contexts" (pp. 187–221). JHU Press.
Rhythmus | Tag | Uhrzeit | Format / Ort | Zeitraum |
---|
Modul | Veranstaltung | Leistungen | |
---|---|---|---|
30-M22 Fachmodul Soziologische Theorie/ Geschichte der Soziologie I | 1. Vertiefendes Theorieseminar | Studienleistung
|
Studieninformation |
2. Vertiefendes Theorieseminar | Studienleistung
|
Studieninformation | |
- | benotete Prüfungsleistung | Studieninformation | |
30-M31 Fachmodul Soziologische Theorie/ Geschichte der Soziologie II (erweitert) | Vertiefendes Theorieseminar 1 | Studienleistung
|
Studieninformation |
Vertiefendes Theorieseminar 2 | Studienleistung
|
Studieninformation | |
- | benotete Prüfungsleistung | Studieninformation | |
30-M4_ver1 Soziologische Theorie I | Vertiefendes Theorieseminar | Studienleistung
|
Studieninformation |
- | benotete Prüfungsleistung | Studieninformation | |
30-M9 Soziologische Theorie II (Vertiefung) | Vertiefungsseminar zur soziologischen Theorie I | Studienleistung
|
Studieninformation |
Vertiefungsseminar zur soziologischen Theorie II | Studienleistung
|
Studieninformation | |
- | benotete Prüfungsleistung | Studieninformation |
Die verbindlichen Modulbeschreibungen enthalten weitere Informationen, auch zu den "Leistungen" und ihren Anforderungen. Sind mehrere "Leistungsformen" möglich, entscheiden die jeweiligen Lehrenden darüber.
In-class:
- Familiarity with the required literature before the start of the first seminar
- Active participation in all of the 4 seminar sessions
Exam ("aktive Teilnahme"):
The students will have the possibility to choose between the following two options:
(1) A summary of one of the three of the following readings: (a) Clark, 1983; (b) Kerr, 2001; or (c) Gumport, 2000. The summary should be in English and should be at least 1.000 words long (which is around 1,5 - 2 pages)/
(2) A short essay on any of the readings (including additional) or any of the topics discussed in the class. The short essay should how that the student is capable to analytically reflect on the subject. It should also be at least 1.000 words.
Students who, in addition to this, wish to write the paper (“Einzelleistung”) are advised to discuss their ideas with the teacher prior to writing.