Methodology of transcultural 'comparative global' social research
When studying processes of globalisation and localisation, fundamental questions of methodology and design will have to be asked in quite a new way than has been the case up to now in development research, sociology and social anthropology.
We have been quite sceptical and hesitating regarding the adequacy of doing comparative research between differen societies, first world and third world, between different cultures or civilisations, given the very heterogeneous and context specific developments. Given the long tradition of regional studies, case studies in social anthropology and fear of transfer of eurocentric concepts in development research, different voices have highlighted the necessitiy of fundamental methodological reconsidering approaches within a process of globalising social science.
Elements in this debate are the increasing interest in strengthening qualitative methodology (criticising e.g. populism of participatory planning methods) and empirically grounding certain theoritical fields such as sociology of Islam (Stauth), gender, social movements, global cities etc.. Social anthropology has developped into sociology of lifeworld. In both disciplines, theorizing is connected with theories and concepts connected to specific cases and regions, with more and more generalizing debates.
The question remains how to compare very different societies and phenomena and there is strong critique of recent standardised approaches on different regions or even global outlook regarding phenomena and concepts assumed to be context neutral such as election conduct, value systems etc. - on an extremely modernistic basis.
In this seminar, three different approaches will be followed up : qualitative analysis of concepts and phenomena considered to be constitutive of globalisation, such as social movements, networks, civil society within a framework of transcultural sociology, thereby avoiding dualisms of blocks, cultures etc. Second, globalisation is studies through its constitutional element of interlinking, global flows, translocal social spaces, networks and movements. Third, globalisation can so to speak be looked at regarding its building up from below, making use of knowledge accumulated by regional studies and looking at glocalisation and localisation.
Literatur:
Basch, Linda, Nina Glick Schiller, Christina Szanton Blanc, 1997, Nations unbound: transnational projects, postcolonial predicaments, and deterriolized nation-states, Amsterdam: Gordon & Beach IA 736B298 128/4054073
Faist, Thomas, 1998, Transnational social spaces out of international migration: evolution, significance and future prospects, in: Archives Européennes de Sociologie, XXXIX, no. 2, S. 213 - 247 HM 000A6 E89 126/321 8267 +01
Gupta, Akhil, James Ferguson, eds., 1997, Anthropological locations. Boundaries and grounds of a field science, Berkeley usw.: Univ. of Calif. Pr. IT 056A6L8 128/4087147+01
Hannerz, Ulf, 2000, Transnational research, in: H. Russel Bernard, Hrsg., Handbook of methods in cultural anthropology, Walnut Creek, London, New Delhi: Altamire Pr., S. 235 - 256 IT325 H2M5C/128/405 3967
Harcourt, Wendy, 2003, Mediating citizenship in the global network society, London: Sage Publ., AF 996M4C5G 020/ 4078158
Inda, Jonathan Xavier, Renato Rosaldo, eds., 2002, Anthropology of globalization, Maiden MA, Oxford: Blackwell HU420A6G5 128/4112637+01
Kaelble, Hartmut, Jürgen Schriewer, Hrsg., Vergleich und Transfer. Komparatistik in den Sozial-, Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften, Frankfurt/M. : Campus
148/4144887+1 14CC080V4T7
Kaschuba, Wolfgang, 2004, Anmerkungen zum Gesellschaftsvergleich aus ethnologischer Perspektive, in: Kaelble, H., J. Schriewer, Hrsg., S. 341 - 350
Marcus, George E., 1998, Ethnography through thick and thin, Princeton, N.J.; Chichester WS: Princeton Univ. Pr., darin bes.: Introduction, anthropology on the move, Kap. 3, Ethnography in/of the World System: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography, S. 3 - 29; 79 - 104 IT 320M322 128/4172221
Stauth, Georg, 1995, Globalisierung, Modernität, nicht-westliche Zivilisationen, in: Josef Langer, Wolfgang Pöllauer, Hrsg., Kleine Staaten in großer Gesellschaft, Eisenstadt:Verl. F. Soziologie und Humanethologie, S. 89 - 107 IE056K6S7G 128/3149550+01
Rhythmus | Tag | Uhrzeit | Format / Ort | Zeitraum |
---|
Studiengang/-angebot | Gültigkeit | Variante | Untergliederung | Status | Sem. | LP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pädagogik / Erziehungswissenschaft / Diplom | (Einschreibung bis SoSe 2008) | H.S.2 | Wahlpflicht | HS | |||
Soziologie | Nebenfach | Pflicht | GS und HS | ||||
Soziologie | Nebenfach | 2.2.2 | Wahlpflicht | HS | |||
Soziologie / Diplom | (Einschreibung bis SoSe 2005) | 2.2.2 | Wahlpflicht | HS | |||
Soziologie / Promotion | Graduierte | ||||||
Soziologie (Nebenfach) / Magister | 2.2.2 | Wahlpflicht | HS | ||||
Soziologie (2. Hauptfach) / Magister | 2.2.2 | Wahlpflicht | HS |