Hintergrundbild
Personen-Piktogramm
Hintergrundbild
Hintergrundbild
Druckversion  Sprachumschaltung
 

Herr Dr. Marius Meinhof: Kontakt

Bild der Person
1. Fakultät für Soziologie / Personen / Wissenschaftliche MitarbeiterInnen
Aufgabenbeschreibung
Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter im Bereich Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung mit dem Schwerpunkt qualitative Methoden (Prof. Ayaß)  
E-Mail
Marius.Meinhof@uni-bielefeld.de  
Telefon
Klicken Sie hier um den Webdialer der Universität aufzurufen +49 521 106-2695  
Telefon Sekretariat
Klicken Sie hier um den Webdialer der Universität aufzurufen +49 521 106-4316Sekretariat zeigen
Büro
Gebäude X D2-201 Lage-/Raumplan
Sprechzeiten

Sprechstunden bitte per E-Mail vereinbaren.

 
Briefkasten
388 X-Magistrale - Ebene C2
2. Fakultät für Soziologie / Arbeitsbereiche / Arbeitsbereich 2 - Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung
Aufgabenbeschreibung
Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter im Bereich Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung mit dem Schwerpunkt qualitative Methoden (Prof. Ayaß)  
3. Bielefeld Graduate School in History and Sociology / Doctoral researchers
E-Mail
Marius.Meinhof@uni-bielefeld.de  
4. BiSEd-Mitglieder
5. Fakultät für Soziologie / Arbeitsbereiche / Arbeitsbereich 2 - Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung / Methodenlabor

Curriculum Vitae

Geboren 07.07.1983, Studium ab 2007 an der Universität Bamberg, Promotionsstudium von 2013 bis 2017 an der Bielefeld Graduate School in History and Sociology. Im Jahr 2014 Visiting Fellow an der Nanjing University in Nanjing, China. Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter an der Bielefeld Graduate School in History and Sociology von 2013 bis 2016, wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter am AB Qualitative Methoden der Fakultät für Soziologie seit 2016.

Dissertation: “Shopping in China. Dispositive konsumistischer Subjektivation im Alltagsleben chinesischer Studierender.” (Abgeschlossen mit summa cum laude)

Aktuelle Forschungsthemen

Governmentality and Subjectivation in China from a Postcolonial Perspective
Since the early 1990ies, reforms in China have been debated from the perspective of governmentality studies with a focus on state-planned cultural change and the effects of modernization/development on society. I argue that governmentality studies have overlooked the historic and globally entangled character of Chinese discourses on modernity. Historic works have shown that debates on “modernization” appeared in China in the context of 19th century colonialism, and “development” is not an ideology specific to the Chinese state alone, but is equally part of Western discourse as well. It is my aim to push for a stronger conceptualization of the heritage of colonialism and colonial memory in works on governmentality in China. Furthermore, I attempt to use postcolonial approaches to place discourses in China and associated scholarly work in the context of global knowledge production.

Consumerist Subjectivation
Consumer practices and objects of consumption constitute one of the most basic mechanisms through which regimes of subjectivation can be enacted and materialized. “Shopping” and shopping environments, as well as the wide variety of bought and consumer objects in use, do constantly create and govern new forms of “making choices”. At the same time, consumption is one of the most pervasive aspects of modern society, that can structure an almost endless range of daily activities, often without being noticed as a structuring force. I hope to further develop Dominik Schrage’s approach on consumerist subjectivation by testing and developing it in ethnographic research projects, and by combining it with insights from research of consumption in nonwestern contexts (especially China). The aim is to create a more nuanced and more “global” perspective on the ways in which consumption works in a world of asymmetric global entanglements.

Videographic Approaches to Materiality
Ethnography and Videography are approaches that can complement the conventional set of surveying and interviewing, especially for researching tacit practices and materiality. Following the classical ethnographies of “material culture” as well as ethnomethodological workplace studies, I am interested in the question, how videography can help making sense of materiality and of materiality’s consequences for social situations. Material culture approaches and ethnomethodological approaches to videography can mutually benefit from each other: On the one hand, videography allows new approaches for studying relations between objects and practices. On the other hand, a focus on objects can help to conceptualize trans-situational connections beyond the direct transfer of meaning through language.

Quicklinks

E-Mailverteiler